ABN Amro on ACCABN Amro has cut ACC’s earnings and downgraded it to ‘sell’. ACC seems financially well-placed with moderate expansion plans, but its earnings outlook has weakened, since the industry may see excess supply for at least two years, which will lower cement prices. FY09 cement demand growth YTD, at 6.6%, is below expectations, due to the stress in credit markets and delays in capex. So, demand estimates for FY10 and FY11 fell by 200 bps each to 8%, which exposes the industry much longer to surplus supply. Restructuring over the past five years has seen ACC exiting non-core businesses. The company, which had high gearing in the last business cycle (1997-03), now seems in a stronger financial position. ABN estimates it will have a debt-equity ratio of just 7% even after financing its entire planned capex of Rs 3,700 crore over the next three years. This will raise its capacity by 9.6%, slightly ahead of the expected demand growth. ACC looks cheap, trading at a cement enterprise value/mmt of $61 (vs replacement cost of $110), but ABN sees more downside to its earnings, given the overhang of excess supply.
HSBC on Hindustan ConstructionHSBC Global has reiterated its ‘underweight’ rating on Hindustan Construction Company (HCC). It has factored in a dividend payment of Re 1 per share, implying a dividend yield of 2.2%. Thus, the total potential return on investment in shares over the next year is -1.8%. HSBC considers the share price to be volatile. For Indian stocks, HSBC considers the average cost of equity to be 11%. A volatile Indian stock with a potential total one-year return of 10 percentage points on either side of 11%, i.e. 1-21%, merits a ‘neutral’ rating. As the potential total one-year return on HCC is less than 1%, HSBC reiterates its ‘underweight’ rating on the stock. A key upside catalyst for the stock is sharp increase in order inflows and reduction in leverage, resulting in lower interest costs. A sharp drop in execution volumes along with demand slowdown remain key downside risks to HSBC’s valuation
CITIGROUP on Power Grid CorporationCITIGROUP has maintained its ‘sell’ rating on Power Grid Corp (PGCIL) with a target price of Rs 69. PGCIL’s shares have outperformed the Sensex, post its IPO. Despite correcting more than 55% from its peak, it is not in the value zone yet. They are trading on par with NTPC, which appears unjustified. The key upside risks are: 1) Favourable CERC regulations for FY10-14E; 2) Faster-than-expected project execution; and 3) Higher non-core business profits. PGCIL has the potential to generate 14-17% returns on its regulatory equity base, compared with NTPC’s 14-22%. NTPC under-reports its profit/net worth. PGCIL matches depreciation under the tariff with reported depreciation, whereas NTPC’s depreciation under the Company Law is higher than under the tariff. PGCIL’s target price of Rs 69 is set at 1.8x FY10E P/BV from 2.2x earlier — a 10% discount to the target P/BV multiple for NTPC. PGCIL’s H1 FY09 reported PAT, at Rs 700 crore, was down 15% y-o-y. But this is largely due to forex fluctuations and a pass-through in tariffs.
Indiabulls Securities on Bank of BarodaINDIABULLS Securities has reiterated its ‘hold’ rating on BoB. The bank reported an average performance in Q209, even as its asset quality improved. It expects interest income to grow by 16% in FY09, against 31% in FY08, as the growth rate of advances is likely to fall to 23% in FY09 vis-Ã -vis 28% in FY08. In addition, the expected fall in yield on investments will affect interest income. Advances may be under pressure due to the global financial crisis and slowdown in the domestic economy. Over 20% of the loan book is accounted for by real estate and SMEs, which are prone to default in the current domestic scenario. BoB’s net interest margin (NIM) increased by a mere 4 bps sequentially to 2.8%. NIM is likely to be under pressure in the coming quarters due to increased cost of deposits, though RBI has lowered its key policy rates. With increased risk-aversion, BoB may shift the mix of interestearning assets from high-yield, risky advances to safer, low-return investments. This is likely to reduce the average yield, further pressurising NIM.
MERRILL Lynch on Reliance Industries MERRILL Lynch has retained it ‘buy’ rating on Reliance Industries (RIL). Its refining margin has consistently been higher than the benchmark Singapore complex refining margin. Analyses suggests RIL’s superior refining margin is due to its ability to refine heavier crude than Dubai. Compared to the last refining downturn, RIL is set to benefit more in FY10-FY11E from its ability to refine heavier crude. Reliance Petroleum’s (RPL) refinery, which is expected to start operations soon, can process even heavier crude than RIL and has a superior product slate. The average discount of Arab heavy to Dubai since FY01 is $2.4/bbl. The discount has sustained at over $5/bbl even in the past six weeks, despite the slump in oil prices. Merrill Lynch estimates RPL’s refining margin at $12.9/bbl if it were to operate in Q3 FY09, vis-Ã -vis Singapore margin of $7.3/bbl. It will produce more gasoline than RIL. Gasoline cracks have always been at a premium to naphtha and LPG cracks. Merrill Lynch feels that a weakening in diesel and gasoline cracks is the main risk to RPL attaining such high margins when it begins operations.
EDELWEISS on Steel Authority of IndiaSAIL has a saleable steel capacity of 13 mt. But with no major capacity expansion over the next two years and moderate demand scenario, incremental volume growth is seen at 0.6 mtpa in FY09E and may decline by 0.4 mtpa in FY10E on production cuts. SAIL’s average volume-based growth till FY10 will be more muted than that of Tata Steel and JSW Steel. The company is targeting completion of modernisation-cum-expansion by end-FY11, which is set to hike its saleable steel capacity to 23.1 mtpa, up 78% from FY08 levels. It will also improve the company’s productivity and refine its product mix. While the project will put SAIL in the global league, its timely completion looks daunting. Due to its scale and operational vastness, SAIL is best-positioned among its peers to gain from Indian steel consumption growth in the next two years. But in the absence of tangible volume growth, slow demand growth for steel, exposure to tight coking coal market, highest susceptibility to government norms on prices, and potential delay in expansion plan, Edelweiss expects SAIL’s margins to be under pressure in the next two years.
Posts
![[ Registered ]](http://www.diarist.net/registry/button.gif){kind=small}
